Mapping the Operational Structure
Defining the eligible universe and the official benchmark for the project.
- Job Descriptions (JDs)
- Area organization
- Profile and seniority mapping
A structured technical validation framework for technology companies undergoing M&A, investment or valuation processes. We replace subjective perception with auditable evidence about the team that sustains the operation.
The invisible problem
In technology companies, IT consultancies and software houses, a meaningful share of value is concentrated in people. Without proper technical validation, the buyer or investor takes on invisible risks.
Inflated seniority levels
Fragile teams
Heavy dependence on specific talents
Limited capacity to scale
Hidden bottlenecks across areas
Numbers reveal part of the picture. Human capital reveals the rest.
New layer
The team's real execution capacity that sustains the operation (rarely measured with rigor, often decisive for the value of the acquired or invested company).
We turn subjective perception into auditable evidence.
Clear method
Defining the eligible universe and the official benchmark for the project.
Direct reading of each professional's LinkedIn profile, cross-checked with the provided JD. If this professional were in the market today, would they pass the initial filter for the role they hold?
Personalized script per professional, with double independent validation. Explores gaps from Stage 2 and problem-solving ability.
Fully personalized validation, exploring each JD and the gaps identified. We measure whether current delivery matches the technical level expected for the seniority held.
We turn individual data into organizational intelligence for decision-making.
Human capital
Technical human capital is not only code. Our methodology adapts to each delivery nature to generate fair, auditable evidence.
Professionals whose primary output is code. Practical code validation and real engineering scenarios.
Professionals who may write code occasionally, but as a means rather than their core function. Evaluated through technical scenarios and structured questionnaires.
Professionals who lead teams and are accountable for goals, deliverables and growth. Evaluated on technical leadership, process and product/business vision.
Executive report
The heart of the report is the Executive View. An objective synthesis for decision-makers, with everything that matters in a single read.
Consolidated team score on a 0–100 scale, synthesizing the three evaluation layers into a single technical risk indicator.
Separate results for Public Technical Score, Structured Interview and Practical Technical Validation, showing where the team holds up and where it doesn't.
Qualitative investor reading: strengths, relevant risks and objective recommendations for the M&A or investment thesis.
Performance distribution across evaluated professionals, with groupings that reveal risk concentration and real execution capacity.
Cross-layer patterns and signals that guide retention, replacement and post-deal integration decisions.
Deep dives that support the Executive View and allow navigating the details when needed.
Who we are

Founder
Designer and entrepreneur with over 20 years in the digital and tech market. PMP, Scrum Master, MBA in Branding and MBA in Technology for Business with a focus on AI, Data Science and Big Data. Leads the design of technical validation processes and specialized recruiting for technology.

Senior HR Consultant
Business administrator with over 40 years of executive HR experience at multinationals such as Alpargatas, Danone, Philip Morris and Coca-Cola. Contributes with behavioral assessment, organizational fit and the structuring of selection processes.

Senior Talent Acquisition Consultant
Over 15 years of experience in recruiting at technology companies and consultancies such as NTTData, DASA, Cogna and Frete.com. Supports recruiting and M&A processes with a focus on conducting interviews and the qualified analysis of professionals.
Frequently asked questions
A methodology to validate the technical and operational capacity of technology companies in acquisition, investment or merger processes.
We help investors and acquirers identify invisible risks related to technical human capital, such as inflated seniorities, operational fragilities and dependency on key professionals.
We combine operational structure, interviews, public evidence and practical technical validation to turn perception into auditable evidence.
While traditional due diligence focuses on financial, legal and tax aspects, Grilo evaluates the actual execution capacity of the technical team.
Yes. The report helps identify technical and operational risks, supporting strategic analysis in M&A transactions.
We generate evidence on the current operational capacity of the team, reducing information asymmetry related to technical human capital.
No. Our focus is on evaluating technical human capital and the operational capacity of the professionals who sustain the operation. Aspects such as infrastructure, security, compliance and governance should be analyzed by specialized complementary diligences.
Get in touch and schedule a conversation.