Mapping the Operating Structure
Defines the eligible universe and the project's official benchmark.
- Job descriptions
- Team/area structure
- Role and seniority mapping
Turn subjective impressions about a target's execution capability into objective, auditable evidence.
The invisible risk
A significant share of a company's value sits with its people. Without the right analysis, critical risks stay invisible until it's too late.
Inflated seniority levels
Fragile teams
Over-reliance on key talent
Limited scaling capacity
Hidden bottlenecks
The numbers tell part of the story. Human capital tells the rest.
A NEW LAYER OF DATA
Team execution capability is rarely measured with the same rigor as the numbers — even though the consequences can be just as damaging.
Gut feel helps. But data protects your deal even further.
A clear method
Defines the eligible universe and the project's official benchmark.
A direct read of each professional's LinkedIn profile, cross-referenced against the stated job description. If this person were on the job market today, would they clear the initial screen for the role they hold?
A personalized script for each professional, with independent double validation. Digs into gaps flagged in Step 2 and tests problem-solving.
Each professional is assessed individually, building on data from the previous steps. We measure whether their execution capability matches the requirements, technical level, and seniority the role demands.
We turn individual data points into organizational intelligence for decision-making.
TECHNICAL TALENT DUE DILIGENCE
Every role demands specific technical competencies — even when the person isn't writing code all day.
Professionals who lead teams or operate in specialized roles. Assessed on leadership or technical execution through practical scenarios and structured questionnaires.
Professionals who may write code occasionally, but it isn't their core function. Also assessed through practical scenarios and structured questionnaires.
Professionals whose primary output is code. Assessed through hands-on technical execution in real-world engineering scenarios.
FINAL REPORT
The output of a Technical Talent Due Diligence engagement is a report that brings together every finding, piece of evidence, and recommendation from the process — structured, objective, and auditable.
A consolidated team score on a 0–100 scale, rolling up all three assessment layers into a single technical risk indicator.
Results broken out by Public Technical Score, Structured Interview, and Individual Technical Assessment, surfacing the team's strengths and weaknesses.
A detailed breakdown of the strengths, weaknesses, risks, and opportunities tied to the target's execution capability.
Performance distribution across the assessed professionals, with groupings that reveal risk concentration and real execution capacity.
Cross-layer patterns that inform retention, replacement, and post-deal integration decisions.
Deep dives that back up the Executive View and let you drill into the details when needed.
OUR TEAM

Founder
Designer and entrepreneur with 20+ years in digital and tech. PMP, Scrum Master, MBA in Branding, and MBA in Technology for Business with a focus on AI, Data Science, and Big Data. Builds technical validation processes and specialized tech recruiting.

Senior HR Consultant
Business administrator with 40+ years of executive HR experience at multinationals including Alpargatas, Danone, Philip Morris, and Coca-Cola. Contributes behavioral assessment, organizational fit, and selection process design.

Senior Talent Acquisition Consultant
15+ years of recruiting experience at tech companies and consultancies including NTT Data, DASA, Cogna, and Frete.com. Supports recruiting and M&A processes, leading interviews and qualified candidate analysis.
Frequently asked questions
It's a proprietary framework we built to assess team execution capability during acquisitions, investments, or valuations.
We help investors spot invisible risks and opportunities tied to human capital execution — inflated seniority levels, weak execution capability, and over-reliance on key people.
We combine operating structure, interviews, public evidence, and hands-on technical validation to turn perception into auditable evidence.
Standard due diligence typically covers financial, legal, and tax. Grilo adds a complementary layer of evidence by assessing the target's current execution capability.
Yes. The report helps identify technical and operational risks, supporting strategic analysis during the investment process.
We generate evidence on the team's current execution capability, reducing information asymmetry around human capital.
No. Our focus is assessing human capital and the execution capability of the people behind the business. Infrastructure, security, compliance, and governance should be covered by specialized complementary diligence.
Get in touch and schedule a call.